LAW1112
Public Law And Statutory Interpretation
LAW1112 is rated by StudentVIP members:
Textbooks
Sell your textbook for LAW1112Public Law and Statutory Interpretation, 2nd Edition
Lisa Burton Crawford, Janina Boughey, Melissa Castan, Maria O'sullivan
For sale by Aayusha for $95
Notes
View all LAW1112 notesHD Public Law Comprehensive Notes
Everything you need to know and more! comprehensive notes covering all topics and every case. Inc...
53 pages, 27270 words
HD Pub Law Notes
super structured and concise, includes tables of all the diff. rules specifically: *statutory in...
23 pages, 9500 words
HD Comprehensive notes
Comprehensive exam notes based on combination of lectures and readings. Topics include Statutory...
41 pages, 1828 words
Public Law and Statutory Interpretation
Incl textbook summaries, lecture notes and own notes. Incl cases and legislation relevant.
164 pages, 20000 words
Pub Law Exam Summary Notes
Notes utilised in part A of Pub Law Exam to structure answers. Includes summary of text rules, conte...
3 pages, 966 words
LAW1112 Public Law and Statutory Interpretation Test and Exam Notes
Topic 1: Introduction and Foundational Concepts Topic 2 Relationships & Structures Topic 3: Orig...
84 pages, 21708 words
Public Law Exam Notes - Author got 86 for subject
These are the perfect notes to take into the Monash Law Public Law and Statutory interpretation Exam...
58 pages, 16890 words
Public Law notes with case summaries
The notes contain: - Topics 1-4 discussions and issues with case summaries - Statutory interpretat...
54 pages, 16077 words
Public Law and Statutory Interpretation Exam Notes
Public Law - Statutory Interpretation and Judicial Power Exam Notes Only Includes: - Why Do Co...
70 pages, 29612 words
HD PUBLIC LAW & STATUTORY INTERPRETATION EXAM NOTES
Full comprehensive notes that covers the entire course used to achieve a HD mark. Includes brief cas...
24 pages, 12345 words
Tutors
Become a tutor for LAW1112Kelly
$30 per hour
Hi! I'm Kelly, your personal tutor. I am a Deans Scholar, and currently in my penultimate year of my...
Billie
$25 per hour
Awesome tutor || Homework helper || Cramming expert || PhD scholarship holder ** Learning is a...
Dave
$30 per hour
Need help with your online assessments? Looking for a personal tutor to help you ACE your courses?...
Nikki
$28 per hour
I'm a PhD candidate who loves to tutor and help my students ACE their assessments! Message me today...
Andrew
$35 per hour
Highly experienced tutor. Currently finishing my PhD at UNSW. I have been tutoring and lecturing for...
Tanya
$65 per hour
Hello! I'm currently in my last year, studying law at Monash University. When it comes to teaching,...
V
$65 per hour
I have completed my law degree with first-class honors and is a lawyer at a big six firm. I sco...
Andrew
$25 per hour
As a PhD graduate and experienced academic, I offer personalized online tutoring services to help yo...
Song
$70 per hour
Online and in person assessment mentorship available. I'm happy to work through homework, past exams...
Reviews
THEPRIVATETUTORING@GMAIL.COM ✅ESSAYS ✅TAKE-HOME EXAMS ✅OPEN-BOOK EXAMS ✅EXAM PREPARATIONS JD graduate student and dual registered Lawyer in Australia with more than 6 years mentoring and tutoring experience. ( including students at UNSW, USYD, UTS, ANU, UNIMEL and ect). Well versed with UNSW and victorian laws ------------------------------------------------------------- Can teach ✅Torts ✅Principle of Private Law ✅Contract Law ✅Public Law ✅Crime and Criminal Process ✅International Public Law ✅Legal writing ✅And etc.
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2020
Fantastic unit. The workshops were really useful and fun! Eric was fantastic! The assignment was super relevant to what was happening in the world at that moment. The videos on stat interpretation were really useful but there could have been more focus on this during the workshops. Some of the cases were a bit difficult to understand why they were important, but if you put in the hours it will all click together. I thought it was a well done unit. The textbook is really good too.
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2020
The first half of this unit is taught by the textbook exactly. I lost marks on the test not because I was factually inaccurate but because there was a correct answer per the textbook. This is in complete contradiction of what your other law lecturers will tell you re: there is usually more than one correct answer. As well as this, and as referenced in other reviews, there is limited teaching as to the statutory interpretation taught in the unit. It is a replica of LAW1111 except that all of the knowledge from LAW1111 is assumed and all they do regurgitate long slabs of case quotes that are almost irrelevant. Throughout all of this there is still a difficulty in deciphering what is factual in terms of discussion and the political bias of the lecturers entering the conversation in workshops. Some lecturers disclose their bias, some don't but it does become all too obvious. This ruined my experience of some of the discussions.
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2019
Although the content was not difficult to comprehend, the unit lacked continuity between the public law areas and the statutory interpretation content, with much overlap with LAW1111 and was often read verbatim from slides and the textbook. The workshop lecturers had different approaches to the final exam. Overall this unit required active participation and seeking out lecturers for questions to succeed.
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2019
Tests and exams are poorly structured and the classes are the same since it’s run through overcrowded seminars rather than tutes. All content is copied from lecturer written textbook
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2018
boring and no structure
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2018
Easily the worst law unit I've ever done - incredibly boring and the midsem test had either super narrow or super broad questions, of which neither tested actual knowledge.
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2015
Subject is okay but my lecturer is drier than a celibate nun
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2016
I dont think the lecturers for the unit were particularly engaging. I found that the course material overlapped a lot with Constitutional Law and Foundations of Law.