The content is really interesting and taught in a very straightforward manner. The dissenting judgements are useful and the lecturers explain why they are important and why you should include them in your exam answers. The only downside to this unit was that some of the lecturer slides were extremely hard to follow and were made to suit the lecturer rather than the student. But others were fantastic. The tutes were super relevant. The assessment was pretty good too although there were some controversies around how it was marked. The exam was fair. It builds on first year law concepts (FOL and PLSI).

Incredibly boring unit, poor lecturers and the assignment made me have break down after break down - an essay on the dissenting judges of the longest HC judgement in history due in Week 6. Very, very painful. Exam was nothing like the practice ones they have given. Poor structure. Reading guide not helpful.