Final notes -- Problem solving supernote

Description

This premium note is your all-in-one toolkit for mastering Principles of Private Law (PPL). Covering all 10 weeks of lecture content at UNSW (Term 1, 2025), this guide is structured by topic and aligned with key case law and statutory authorities. It’s not just a case summary collection—it’s a problem-solving manual designed for exam use, packed with answer templates, analogical reasoning structures, and legal tests with clear case applications. Whether you're preparing for open-book finals or tackling complex hypotheticals, this note teaches you how to apply the law, not just memorise it. Every case includes its facts, ratio, judicial reasoning, and doctrinal significance, with practical cues for which legal point it supports—saving you time and boosting your confidence during assessment. What Makes This Note Special: Structured by exam topics, mirroring real problem question structure Includes ready-to-use analogical sentence templates for IRAC writing Identifies legal tests with court-approved phrasing Highlights when each case supports intention, possession, reliance, detriment, or legal effect Ideal for quick reference and last-minute revision Authored by a top-performing law student with deep understanding of UNSW’s assessment style Topics Covered: Agency: actual vs ostensible authority, legal consequences Property: contract formation, lease vs licence, proprietary interests Fixtures: legal test, chattel vs fixture, tenant’s rights Possessory Torts & Bailment: trespass, conversion, detinue, remedies, dual claims Adverse Possession: statutory limitation, factual possession, intention to possess Transfer of Interest in Land & Part Performance: s 54A(1)-(2), equitable interests, constructive trust Equitable Estoppel: proprietary and promissory estoppel, unconscionability, proportional remedies Bonus Features: Case authorities include Toll v Alphapharm, Crabtree-Vickers, Whittlesea, Waltons Stores, Pipikos, Sidhu v Van Dyke, and more Each legal test comes with a breakdown of how to argue both sides ( valid/invalid authority, enforceable/uncertain term) Perfectly aligned with final exam requirements and legal reasoning expectations