Disclaimer: this is just a rant - an unserious, opinion-based piece of writing written for humour. Any reference or resemblance to actual people, events, or cats are purely coincidental, unintentional, and assumed by the reader. None of it should be taken as a factual claim about anyone in particular. The comments within are directed at no person or persons in particular. The lectures of this subject made me feel like I was being billed by the hour, and the speakers certainly gave the impression they were getting paid as such. I suspect They Who Shall Not Be Named completed a double-degree consisting of Law + Student Suffering. For someone who seems to think they're some supreme and untouchable being, they sure go out of their way to establish just how unlikeable a human(?) can be. It’s ironic how their email response time makes me think I’ve been denied my due process. They need to take a break from reading legislation, because it’s clearly bleeding into their posts and emails. Don't you dare bother them by asking for some consideration re your assessments! Once they're finished lecturing their cat on mens rea, they'll spend approximately 12 days thinking of some unique way to tell you, effectively, to go away and refer to the comments on your assessment. So you do that... you refer to the comments left on your assessment and you encounter gems such as "more clarity required". Thanks! That's ironic! Now if only I knew which one of your 37 unrelated thoughts that applied to! Its like they leave 'feedback' solely to tick a box, not to actually help you improve. If their comments didn't satisfy you (like their ex, you'll never be satisfied...) have a go at deciphering the rubric - OR, their favourite - practice emotional suppression! Because hey, who needs a conversation when you can just stew in your frustration?

Similar in expectations to torts, LLB106 is a fantastic and fascinating subject. Again, hats off to James Duffy!

Great subject

I killed a few trees for the final exam but overall an interesting subject. Revise the whole way and the course becomes much simpler. Toughest part would easily be the Committal Brief.

Overall this was a good subject. The content was really interesting - particularly the case readings. The teachers were good on the whole. It's easy enough to pass the assessments, but hard to do well; it's easy to miss marks. I couldn't give Crim 4 stars because I didn't get any feedback on any of my assignments. Feedback on the assignments would have helped a lot on the exam. Other than that, I enjoyed the course pretty well.